Difference between revisions of "User talk:Nx"
(→Frot.) |
|||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
:::We're deleting you next. {{User:Mei II/w}} 18:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC) | :::We're deleting you next. {{User:Mei II/w}} 18:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::EC--Porn? On the Internet? Who would ever have imagined. the fucking thing has been here for months. How many complaints have we been inundated with? All I'm saying is a little "hey, I think this image is problematic, should we delete it?" with three confirming voices would have been nice, and set a handy precedent. [[User:TheoryOfPractice|TheoryOfPractice]] ([[User talk:TheoryOfPractice|talk]]) 18:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC) | ::::EC--Porn? On the Internet? Who would ever have imagined. the fucking thing has been here for months. How many complaints have we been inundated with? All I'm saying is a little "hey, I think this image is problematic, should we delete it?" with three confirming voices would have been nice, and set a handy precedent. [[User:TheoryOfPractice|TheoryOfPractice]] ([[User talk:TheoryOfPractice|talk]]) 18:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::If Marcus Cicero had pulled this stunt, you would have banned me. It's a liberal double standard, that's all I'm saying. Twats. <sup>— Sincerely, [[User:Neveruse|Neveruse]] / [[User_Talk:Neveruse|Talk]] / [[Special:Block/Neveruse|Block]]</sup> 18:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:40, 30 March 2010
Why are you so humourless?
Why? You come across as a particularly boring sod. AntiNx (talk) 11:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for cropping that image
Dear Nx,
Many thanks for editing this pic from Capturebot2. I'm sorry for creating such a massive file and my job for this evening was to have been to learn how to edit it and/or how to upload my local, cropped screen capture. I should probably do that now anyway though!
Thanks again, --NotANumber (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- No need to apologize, you can't upload images until you make a few edits and your account is a few days old, to prevent vandals from registering and uploading porn or some other crap. -- Nx / talk 22:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- That's right, we only trust experienced editors to upload porn. ħuman 01:08, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
This is educational.Warning: NSFW Image!
- Exactly, they could load up exactly the wrong sort of porn. - π 02:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Dammit Nx
So when I try to log into RW from my Itouch, suddenly, after a few more attempts then usual due to forgetting my password, I suddenly find myself locked out with the message "Error: too many recent login attempts on this account". I am now in a severly pissed state due to my forced iP editing. So, I have two questions:
- Who the Hell made logging in such a bitch? After ONE missed attempt to login, I now have to use a recapcha, copypaste a gian string of text, and then try again. If I screw up twice, the computer makes me submit to a full cavity search. If I mess it up three times, the server sends FBI agents to my house. This draconian login system is NOT user friendly! If you're worried about brute-force attempts, you could just as easily set the limit of tries at 100 or a thousnad tries, and there would still be no way that the computer could get in, and people like me could actually log in without being locked out.
- Hiw long will it take until I can have access to my account again, so I cam banhammer your and Trent's asses?
Sincerely,
A VERY pissed Theemperor.
- This edit made my fucking day. An almost Ace-worthy level of vitriol. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 21:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- "Who the Hell made logging in such a bitch?" werdna [1]
- "If you're worried about brute-force attempts, you could just as easily set the limit of tries at 100 or a thousnad tries, and there would still be no way that the computer could get in" It increases the chance of someone correctly guessing your password.
- "Hiw long will it take until I can have access to my account again, so I cam banhammer your and Trent's asses?" 300 seconds, then you get 5 more attempts. -- Nx / talk 09:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I have to agree, this is quite amusing. The easiest solution would be to not forget your password. moral 21:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Still, I agree with the emperor here. Five tries? I have a handful of versions of a similar password I use, and if on a device that hasn't saved them all it could easily take 5 tries to get in. How about making life easier for your fellow RWians, Nx? How about 10 or 20 tries in 10 seconds? A bot would never waste 5 minutes just trying 5 passwords. ħuman 02:23, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- These are the defaults. I've increased the nubmer of tries to 10. That is, IMHO, quite reasonable. Use a password manager if you have bad memory or a device that sacrifices ergonomics for looks. -- Nx / talk 09:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Of course you are logging in with a http conection instead of a https, so your login in details are being sent in plain text. A determined hacker can sit on the connection and read your password as it goes past. - π 09:40, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- These are the defaults. I've increased the nubmer of tries to 10. That is, IMHO, quite reasonable. Use a password manager if you have bad memory or a device that sacrifices ergonomics for looks. -- Nx / talk 09:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Still, I agree with the emperor here. Five tries? I have a handful of versions of a similar password I use, and if on a device that hasn't saved them all it could easily take 5 tries to get in. How about making life easier for your fellow RWians, Nx? How about 10 or 20 tries in 10 seconds? A bot would never waste 5 minutes just trying 5 passwords. ħuman 02:23, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- This edit made my fucking day. An almost Ace-worthy level of vitriol. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 21:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Frot.
"Jokes," if not "harassment" is a big part of why we're here. So is discussing things before unilaterally deleting them. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 18:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Guess what, ToP? People coming here don't expect to see porn. Evil educated Hoover! 18:29, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Is anyone surprised by the identity of the perpetrator? — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:33, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- We're deleting you next. Mei (talk) 18:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- EC--Porn? On the Internet? Who would ever have imagined. the fucking thing has been here for months. How many complaints have we been inundated with? All I'm saying is a little "hey, I think this image is problematic, should we delete it?" with three confirming voices would have been nice, and set a handy precedent. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 18:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- We're deleting you next. Mei (talk) 18:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Is anyone surprised by the identity of the perpetrator? — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:33, 30 March 2010 (UTC)