Difference between revisions of "User talk:Neveruse"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Whats up?: new section)
Line 68: Line 68:
 
:::You know damn well what you did you did.  Trying to place bets of 5 internets on the admin abuse page is against teh roolz and will result in you being blocked for an amount of time to be deteremined by the student advisory panel. {{User:Gooniepunk2010/sig|}} 07:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 
:::You know damn well what you did you did.  Trying to place bets of 5 internets on the admin abuse page is against teh roolz and will result in you being blocked for an amount of time to be deteremined by the student advisory panel. {{User:Gooniepunk2010/sig|}} 07:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 
::::I have no idea why you think these people deserve the time of day, Goonie!  I think the {{LJ}} should ban, block, and draw and quarter this user for crimes against humanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! {{unsig|Human}}
 
::::I have no idea why you think these people deserve the time of day, Goonie!  I think the {{LJ}} should ban, block, and draw and quarter this user for crimes against humanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! {{unsig|Human}}
 +
 +
== Whats up? ==
 +
 +
You really need to hit the nail on the head more. In my absence, RW is getting licentious in its insolence. Some of the immaturity is too funny to pass down, such as Susans pathetic 'leaving and never coming back' spiel. Act more Neveruse! All of this collective fellatio must be mocked and ridiculed!

Revision as of 01:22, 20 March 2010

This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page:
  1. REDIRECT User:Neveruse
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Neveruse!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

So, will you never use this account? Heh... heh... sometimes my puns astoud me! :P ArmondikoVpathetic 08:46, 30 January 2009 (EST)

That was the original intent. But, let's see how that works out... Neveruse513 16:41, 30 January 2009 (EST)

Whatever you just WIGOed has beern already been torched by TK. ЩєазєюіδWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 17:01, 30 January 2009 (EST)
Thanks, I'll get working on the screen cap. Neveruse513 17:04, 30 January 2009 (EST)
Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħumanUser talk:Human 00:18, 31 January 2009 (EST)

Hello, Neveruse! Welcome to the virtually exorciseing petroglyph! Are you enjoying your time here? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:12, 31 January 2009 (EST)

w

I'm starting to think you don't like ListenerX somehow. -- =w= 18:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

He's a pseudoscientist and utter douchebag who gets a free ride to push his ridiculous and illogical beliefs simply because he has nothing better to do than defend them. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:53, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
In that sentence, 'push' means 'talk about'. Super. -- =w= 18:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
No, push means revert and go on and on and on until resistors give up. He's a psuedoscientist and will never stop trying to justify himself. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  1. That still isn't what push means in the real world.
  2. 'never stop trying to justify himself' - Yes that's what people do.
90% of what he does is great. The other 10% is shit. He should be under various topic bans. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm really glad we don't have topic bans. -- =w= 19:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
(EC) Neveruse, I was not "gloating" in that section. I do not appreciate gothar involving themselves in politics at all, and I do not appreciate unsubstantiated accusations of article ownership. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 19:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Unsubstantiated claims of article ownership? You're fucking insane. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
He obviously meant 'unsubstantiated' in the sense that you didn't substantiate them. I can see your confusion. -- =w= 19:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Fuck off for a second Mei... That I would even have to justify these allegations, like there's anyone who cares who hasn't been witness to LX's ownership of the article is insulting. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to insult you. Stop being angry. -- =w= 19:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
It does make me angry that this douchebag parades himself around as a rational person, owns his pet article and defends it until no one else can stand it, then denies all of it. It'd be like me denying him calling him a douchebag until he actually trots out the evidence we all know exists. I don't see why I have to go through the motions when anyone who gives a shit already knows. The only thing "substantiating" his ownership of the article would do is give him another endless tangent about "ownership" and "cooperation" and "rationality" and somehow "Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem". It's his game to be a blowhard, esoteric douchebag. I'm not playing. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
zomg, how is Gödel involved? -- =w= 19:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
He proved that not everything true is provable. An esoteric point, yes, but an earth-shattering one.
Neveruse, obvious truths are much more easily substantiated than most. On the other hand you appear to have no substantiations whatever for your claims. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 19:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
EC I knew that part, I just didn't see the relevance. I should have guessed really. -- =w= 19:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
+ it's not that esoteric. -- =w= 19:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Like I said, I'm not playing your endless games just because you have nothing better to do. I'm thoroughly enjoying your delusions, though...You're just a rational guy who doesn't own that article! — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
If you decline to "play [my] endless games," if that is how you refer to the requirement that accusations be substantiated before being swallowed whole, I suggest you drop any further dispute. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 19:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

You're back?

Good. 'Cause we need to have a word. I just got out of the POLICE STATION because of what YOU said to them. 36 hours in a freakin' holding cell, numerous interrogations--I'm surprised they didn't being out the cattle prod. Look, bub, a joke's a joke, but this has gone too far. I'm considering legal action unless you Cease and Desist. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

JPatt's "values"

Man you just beat me to it.. Since you commented your edit with "Still needs work", I took a stab at it. Tried to add some of that article's tone into the WIGO, because I found it fairly amusing how it basically went "Well they did honor the soldiers... but normally they hate the military and want to destroy America and rantrantrant.. If you don't think it's any good, feel free to revert. --GTac (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the improvements. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 17:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Please stop being a prick. Thanks. Acei9 20:07, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I second the above motion. Scarlet A.pngpostate 20:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
If only entertaining you two was as fun as entertaining myself... If you're not having fun, find something better to do. Jesus Christ... — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Say that's great! Now stop being such a pain. Thanks. Acei9 20:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Don't you have anything else to do? — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
"Ooh I was just doing it for the lulzzzz don't be so SERIOUS WIKI CABALL!!! LOLZ" is not an answer. Just stop being a prick. Scarlet A.pngpostate 20:17, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
That's funny cuz, uh...that's my answer. ignore or abuse. your choice, bitch. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
9am on a Saturday morning, fiancee asleep....so no, not right now. I'll do some gadening later. Acei9 20:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Stop breaking my Wiki

....Or is it Human's wiki today? I forget. Either way, stop breaking it! The Goonie Punk Can't sleep, clowns will eat me! 07:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Check the schedule, I think Nx babysits while Human is gone. Anyway, what'd I do??? — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
hhahahahahaahahahahaahahahaha nice! ħumanUser talk:Human 07:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
You know damn well what you did you did. Trying to place bets of 5 internets on the admin abuse page is against teh roolz and will result in you being blocked for an amount of time to be deteremined by the student advisory panel. The Goonie 1 What's this button do? Uh oh.... 07:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I have no idea why you think these people deserve the time of day, Goonie! I think the Licentious Jalopies should ban, block, and draw and quarter this user for crimes against humanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Unsigned, by: Human / talk / contribs

Whats up?

You really need to hit the nail on the head more. In my absence, RW is getting licentious in its insolence. Some of the immaturity is too funny to pass down, such as Susans pathetic 'leaving and never coming back' spiel. Act more Neveruse! All of this collective fellatio must be mocked and ridiculed!