Difference between revisions of "User talk:Human"
(→FYI) |
|||
Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
::I again support vandal binning Rob, if only to force him to use the preview button. Wanking with one hand and wikilawyering with the other seems to introduce a lot of errors. --[[User:Kels|Kels]] ([[User talk:Kels|talk]]) 23:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ::I again support vandal binning Rob, if only to force him to use the preview button. Wanking with one hand and wikilawyering with the other seems to introduce a lot of errors. --[[User:Kels|Kels]] ([[User talk:Kels|talk]]) 23:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::...such as the [[Fun:Kara_Duhe|Kara's Yellow Dress]] episode? [[User:TheoryOfPractice|TheoryOfPractice]] ([[User talk:TheoryOfPractice|talk]]) 23:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | :::...such as the [[Fun:Kara_Duhe|Kara's Yellow Dress]] episode? [[User:TheoryOfPractice|TheoryOfPractice]] ([[User talk:TheoryOfPractice|talk]]) 23:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::Served it's purpose. We collected twenty-three usernames involved in that violation of [[Wikipedia:Harassment#Off-wiki_harassment]], (and I'm just a single user): | ||
+ | :::::*'''''Harassment of other Wikipedians in forums not controlled by the Wikimedia Foundation''' creates doubt as to whether an editor's on-wiki actions are conducted in good faith. Off-wiki harassment will be regarded as an aggravating factor by administrators and '''is admissible evidence in''' the dispute-resolution process, including '''Arbitration cases'''''. | ||
::::That, and the suspicious stains on his photo of Joe McCarthy. --[[User:Kels|Kels]] ([[User talk:Kels|talk]]) 23:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ::::That, and the suspicious stains on his photo of Joe McCarthy. --[[User:Kels|Kels]] ([[User talk:Kels|talk]]) 23:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:22, 29 March 2010
- The 2008 election night party is enshrined at this dump. Thank you all for popping in, it was a blast!
- The May 20/21 2009 RationalWiki second birthday party is here. There may still be some stains on the carpet, so be careful.
- Somewhere around here I usually express my preference for avoiding table-tennis conversations. If I muck up your talk page, I'll stalk you until you reply there. If you defame my lovely estate of ones and zeros here, I'll add some random non sequitur to it here. Cheers! ħuman
- Threads over seven days old are automatically archived by an irrational "bot"
You have been smitten by a bunny in accordance with the community standards for... no real reason. Feel free to revert this odd edit.
(sticky) Note to self for 10/21
Go here and check for 10/6 archive and get clip of my email being read. ħuman 23:39, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- I just listened and would like to congratulate you on your new found fame. YorickIs Joe Biden Eva Braun? 05:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you, and thanks for the heads up! ħuman 05:45, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Too bad I didn't write it in a way that "expected" it to be read verbatim on the air, causing Malloy to stumble a bit due to the style. And, luckily, RW.org comes straight to RW.com! Can't believe I mucked that up. ħuman 23:40, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Nx for ogging it up for me! ħuman 00:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
(sticky) Comic Strip Presents
- Classic! BTW, not sure if you saw the link I added for you. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 15:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Victor Borge (sticky)
I think I remember you saying you had never seen his piano comedies before, so I found a couple clips for you here and part 2 here. Enjoy! The Spikey Punk I'm punking my punk! 21:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hilarious! ħuman 23:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- Beautiful! ħuman 00:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- I knew you'd enjoy it. Cheers! Lord of the Goons The official spikey-haired skeptical punk 05:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks, for wasting my entire Sunday :) ħuman 05:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- I knew you'd enjoy it. Cheers! Lord of the Goons The official spikey-haired skeptical punk 05:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- Follow me ħuman 07:12, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Best music video evah! ħuman 09:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
LJ badge thing
moved to Template talk:LJ badge ħuman 05:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Quick note for you. The blank version of the badge is up there. --Ask me about your mother 16:19, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks! Dang, you removed the little eight-sided panel as well. Oh well... ħuman 20:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Ooops! Looks like a camera finally caught you
Taking out your aggressions on a small animal. It's just a small step from this to being a mean insulting bully to your fellow man, Huw. Oh...wait..you already do that! Never mind. --TK/MyTalkRW User #45 08:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Not me. Perhaps you? Or your fantasy? ħuman 08:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Anyone who says the mean, disgusting things you do about others, Huw, has a problem that needs help. Where else but here do you speak the same way? Anyway not my problem. --TK/MyTalkRW User #45 08:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you are talking about, you tiny man. No links of course come with your accusations, that is your deceitful lying style, as it always has been. Go to sleep.... or better yet, go edit CP. ħuman 08:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Anyone who says the mean, disgusting things you do about others, Huw, has a problem that needs help. Where else but here do you speak the same way? Anyway not my problem. --TK/MyTalkRW User #45 08:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
I don't have to post links, your vile personal comments to just me are proof enough of what I am talking about, despicable man. When a person cannot offer intellectual proof of disagreement, they always stoop to personal insults. --TK/MyTalkRW User #45 21:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- When a person cannot offer intellectual proof of disagreement, they always stoop to personal insults. ħuman 20:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- That Terry would even go looking for such a pic, in order to bolster his inane rambling, speaks volumes about what a warped little man he is. --PsygremlinTala! 10:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- I found a picture of another of Huw's victims. Won't somebody stop this monster? WëäŝëïöïďMethinks it is a Weasel 10:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- That Terry would even go looking for such a pic, in order to bolster his inane rambling, speaks volumes about what a warped little man he is. --PsygremlinTala! 10:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Given where he lives and how much time he spends indoors on his computer, I doubt Human's arms are quite that tanned. Though for some reason I do see him wearing butt-ugly cowboy boots : ) Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 11:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Even if I get lots of sun, I only turn a whiter shade of pale... ħuman 21:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Huw sends me naked pictures all the time, and he is one handsome devil. To the best of my knowledge he doesn't kill dogs. SJ Debaser 15:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Huw, don't you know that SuperJosh is underage? Why don't you send your nudie pics to someone mature enough to handle your nakedness—like TheoryOfPractice, Gooniepunk, or Susan? Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Those three all all already on the listserv. Josh used a fake ID to cover, er, uncover, my ass. ħuman 02:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm of age, actually RA. SJ Debaser 11:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- You mean what we've been doing all this time was actually legal? : ) Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 19:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm of age, actually RA. SJ Debaser 11:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Those three all all already on the listserv. Josh used a fake ID to cover, er, uncover, my ass. ħuman 02:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Terry, that picture literally made me shudder. That you would:
- Search for a picture like that
- Post it up here
- Accusing someone on here of being the perp (and if was a 'joke', then that probably even worse)
- shows just what a disgusting, despicable, despisable, complete and utter cunt you really are. DeltaStarSenior SysopSpeciationspeed! 15:44, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Huw, don't you know that SuperJosh is underage? Why don't you send your nudie pics to someone mature enough to handle your nakedness—like TheoryOfPractice, Gooniepunk, or Susan? Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Huw sends me naked pictures all the time, and he is one handsome devil. To the best of my knowledge he doesn't kill dogs. SJ Debaser 15:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Even if I get lots of sun, I only turn a whiter shade of pale... ħuman 21:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Not offensive?
Douchebag isn't offensive? Anyway, I can feed the troll if that's what you want. -- Nx / talk 12:10, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- I suppose I just should have just saved it straight to your archive... ħuman 20:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Looks to me like you pwned him pretty well anyway. Nice work. ħuman 04:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
David Frum on health insurance reform and conservative failure
You might find this OpEd piece by conservative David Frum of much interest. I know I found it intriguing. Gooniepunk2010 Oi! Oi! Oi! 21:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Deja vu! Mikey's reading it right now. ħuman 02:42, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
An echo of lost ages
So I see your still floating around. Anyone else from the old days still on here? ɧєɭıסş-get sunburn! 04:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ice still turns up, and Kels and Susan are still active. Who from the cabal, though? Trent during school breaks, surely at least a couple others? Yeah, Sid is still active. Doc pops in once in a while, but is busy with life and his blog. I'll think of two more as soon as I hit "save", I'm sure! So how have you been and to what do we owe the honor of your visit? ħuman 04:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- I was talking with Ice a while back about CP/RW and just all of a sudden thought of it tonight and felt like getting on. I've been pretty good, though my presence on the internet has decreased significantly. What about you? ɧєɭıסş-get sunburn! 05:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Cool. I wondered why the internet was so dran the last couple years! I survived 2009 ;). Still enjoying this place, not sure how much it has changed or stayed the same since the old days since I've been here all along. Be interesting to see what you think if you stick around a bit. ħuman 05:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- I was talking with Ice a while back about CP/RW and just all of a sudden thought of it tonight and felt like getting on. I've been pretty good, though my presence on the internet has decreased significantly. What about you? ɧєɭıסş-get sunburn! 05:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Red Exclamation Marks
I try to look at the red exclamation marks & the edit for the New World Encyclopedia wasn't instantaneously understandable. As thinking hurts and it was made by a BoN, I asked for an explanation & reverted it (I felt the Power)... larronsicut fur in nocte 21:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- I went through them all and then went to the last one and hit "rollback". In the meantime you had undone only the last edit, so I went back to the pre-BoN version and saved that. One edit BoN made was to insert weird argumentative language into the middle of an obviously quoted section. Which I am now hunting for the source of (http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Info:Project_Vision), which no longer (did it ever?) matches what we have. ħuman 21:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- through them all? Kudos! Great, thanks... larronsicut fur in nocte 21:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- There were only 5 or 6, I think, from this one BoN. ħuman 00:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- through them all? Kudos! Great, thanks... larronsicut fur in nocte 21:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Look around you....
Did you get what we're looking for? Correct! Music. Punky Your mental puke relief 03:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- They skipped "30 END". The BASIC I used to use (still have manual!) would not run without an END statement. Isn't this the crazy science parody show I see once in a while on PBS? ħuman 03:31, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sure is. I worship that show. And the school board meetings I catch once in a while. Ran into the chair at the dump swappe shoppe, recognized her, told her she was my favorite TV show... ħuman 03:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Glad you enjoyed it, then. Punky Your mental puke relief 03:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed. I've actually seen this one. I love the fake science/technology, reminds me of irony meter. Or inspired it, not sure which. ħuman 03:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Glad you enjoyed it, then. Punky Your mental puke relief 03:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
One simple word needed
Thanks, I suspected it would be something like that, but I wasn't sure and I've never seen "manner" used like that. -- Nx / talk 09:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Sometimes languages - even ones we think we know - can be very complicated. And then simple when one sees what's missing. Thanks for the friendly :) ħuman 09:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Jw xP
What did you find unsubstantial concerning my edits? :P (I don't really wondering, just out of curiosity.) — Unsigned, by: Beyonddeities / talk / contribs
- If I reverted them/rolled them back, there could be many reasons. Check my edit comment if there was one. If you are curious as to a specific edit/undo, pop the difflink up here and I'll explain further, if you wish. Also, please sign your comments as told on your talk page. ħuman 10:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
TK
You must have pissed him off again, and the one with the fragile ego is lashing out the only way he knows how... deleting stuff on CP. Still, at least it looks like Terrykins dreamed up your very own deletion reason. --PsyGremlinParlez! 11:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Aw, it finally occurred to the Troll Knave to delete my sub-pages! I've been chuckling at them still existing for years. ħuman 20:52, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Rejoice!
Rejoice despite the fact this world will hurt you. The Goonie 1 What's this button do? Uh oh.... 06:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Nice guitars! Although I do have a problem with singers who don't understand the concept of "key". Call me old fashioned. NOW GET OFF MY LAWN! hehe ħuman 07:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Category:Known liars please do not delete talk page comments, you piece of excrement
Okay, fine by me, Huw. --TK/MyTalkRW User #45 10:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
LJ & RS
Would Loya Jirga consider temporarily blocking RobSmith about the WP stuff? This is getting out of hand. Šţěŗĭļė leak 17:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Loya Jirga retired. It sure was useful while it lasted, but all good things must come to an end. Anyway, I've been thinking along similar lines, if these shenanigans continue, but there should be a stern warning on his user page first. WëäŝëïöïďMethinks it is a Weasel 17:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Cripes, I'm a member and nobody even had the decency to drop a note on my talk page about it. Probably would have been nice to know. And yes, I support blocking Rob for a day over this. Or at the very least, binning for a day. --Kels (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- LJ is finished? Shum mistake?--BobSpring is sprung! 18:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Probably not finished, although not really started either. Given that the retirement template went up within a minute of this & this one, it looks like part of Susan's L&NCB thing, although it's supposed to be a shared account. My comment above was not entirely serious, but I think there's a lot of uncertainty about what the LJ is there for, when it's supposed to kick in & how it's supposed to work. WëäŝëïöïďMethinks it is a Weasel 23:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- LJ is finished? Shum mistake?--BobSpring is sprung! 18:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Cripes, I'm a member and nobody even had the decency to drop a note on my talk page about it. Probably would have been nice to know. And yes, I support blocking Rob for a day over this. Or at the very least, binning for a day. --Kels (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
FYI
Human, do some homework. Observe how the MEDCAB works. (Goatse dispute) You should familiarize yourself how WP:DR works. I'm here to help. nobsdon't bother me 23:00, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you're on about there, Rob. Care to explain? ħuman 23:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- This img in dispute (whether or not its acceptable content for WP) once upon a time was uploaded to CP about the time disputes were raging over cp:Gay bowel syndrome. Open cases are good to follow, cause the MEDCAB guys usually are up to speed on policy changes based on recent ArbCom findings and remedies (most of these guys wanna run for ArbCom or Board of Trustees someday, and bringing disputing parties together looks good on their record). nobsdon't bother me 23:22, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Rob, I still have no idea what your point is. On wikipedia I mostly fix typos and remove stray words that obviously don't belong. What does that have to do with your medicine cabinet? ħuman 23:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- This img in dispute (whether or not its acceptable content for WP) once upon a time was uploaded to CP about the time disputes were raging over cp:Gay bowel syndrome. Open cases are good to follow, cause the MEDCAB guys usually are up to speed on policy changes based on recent ArbCom findings and remedies (most of these guys wanna run for ArbCom or Board of Trustees someday, and bringing disputing parties together looks good on their record). nobsdon't bother me 23:22, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I again support vandal binning Rob, if only to force him to use the preview button. Wanking with one hand and wikilawyering with the other seems to introduce a lot of errors. --Kels (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- ...such as the Kara's Yellow Dress episode? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Served it's purpose. We collected twenty-three usernames involved in that violation of Wikipedia:Harassment#Off-wiki_harassment, (and I'm just a single user):
- Harassment of other Wikipedians in forums not controlled by the Wikimedia Foundation creates doubt as to whether an editor's on-wiki actions are conducted in good faith. Off-wiki harassment will be regarded as an aggravating factor by administrators and is admissible evidence in the dispute-resolution process, including Arbitration cases.
- That, and the suspicious stains on his photo of Joe McCarthy. --Kels (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Served it's purpose. We collected twenty-three usernames involved in that violation of Wikipedia:Harassment#Off-wiki_harassment, (and I'm just a single user):
- ...such as the Kara's Yellow Dress episode? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
2 Questions....
Has the LJ been retired? I am aware nothing happened with it but it served a good purpose at the time - the whole process brough the site back together again. Secondly, someone wanna give me a brief on this RobSmith/WP thing? Whats happened? Acei9 23:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Q1 - No. Susan put up a retired template unilaterally. To retire the Loya Jirga we would need to invent the Grand Tribunal, who are more powerful still. All will quail before their judgement. Mei (talk) 23:31, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Q2, best places to start would be Sid and Trent's talk pages, and the wp:talk:conservapedia. ħuman 23:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Q2. The short version is Rob figured that he had something he could hold over RW, so he started bitching on WP about who founded RW and insisting it be changed to PalMD being the sole founder. He immediately took it to as many boards as he could, and was uniformly told he was full of shit. Now he's trying to get it changed back to the version with mistakes in it then deleted, apparently to get rid of the history, then have mention of RW removed from the CP article over there. All the while leaving cryptic threats of dragging all and sundry before ARBCOM and whatever other board he can get his hands on. He's way less lucid through this than he usually is, and that's saying something. If I got something wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me. --Kels (talk) 23:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I thought this discussion came out of the argument that random guy started about RW editors conducting "warfare" at WP. Now I'm even more confused. Mei (talk) 23:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- This thing with Rob flared up right right after that thing fizzled out. I wouldn't be surprised if they're in cahoots. WëäŝëïöïďMethinks it is a Weasel 23:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I might have missed something at the start, but where it stands currently is Rob threatening people and having a hard-on for keeping discussions off WP and getting the RW article over there deleted rather than kept or made a redirect. --Kels (talk) 23:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I thought this discussion came out of the argument that random guy started about RW editors conducting "warfare" at WP. Now I'm even more confused. Mei (talk) 23:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Q2. The short version is Rob figured that he had something he could hold over RW, so he started bitching on WP about who founded RW and insisting it be changed to PalMD being the sole founder. He immediately took it to as many boards as he could, and was uniformly told he was full of shit. Now he's trying to get it changed back to the version with mistakes in it then deleted, apparently to get rid of the history, then have mention of RW removed from the CP article over there. All the while leaving cryptic threats of dragging all and sundry before ARBCOM and whatever other board he can get his hands on. He's way less lucid through this than he usually is, and that's saying something. If I got something wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me. --Kels (talk) 23:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Q2, best places to start would be Sid and Trent's talk pages, and the wp:talk:conservapedia. ħuman 23:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
LJ and process etc.
Random factoids:
- The user "LJ" never became the "shared account" it was intended to be.
- When Susan left and never coming backed, she explicitly said she'd return if the Lurking Jerk-offs was called into session.
- We have no idea how to call the Leary Jumbles into session, how or where.
- I suggest we use RobS' insanity as a "test case", to experiment with process.
Here is what I propose. We use the forum for "cases". Each case becomes a new subforum. Whoever opens a case should 1. be directly affected by whatever they are complaining about and 2. use the "email this user" feature to inform each of The Seven of the new case 3. make sure they present their complaint clearly with good difflinks to evidences.
You guys want to give it a try? ħuman 23:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I can't guarantee I'd be able to fully engage, since I'm in finals for the next month or so, but otherwise no arguments. --Kels (talk) 23:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- The minimum requirement for any LJ member would be to pop in and say they're too busy and to carry on without them. ħuman 23:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Works for me however as a LJ I'd have to abstain from a vote as I was on holiday during the period in question. Acei9 23:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Dang, don't ban me; I'd loose my COI in editing wp:RationalWiki (could look petty and be a tragedy if the RW entry at WP survives and boatload of RW editors get banned by WP:Arbcom). Jeezusshhhh........ nobsdon't bother me 23:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Works for me however as a LJ I'd have to abstain from a vote as I was on holiday during the period in question. Acei9 23:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- The minimum requirement for any LJ member would be to pop in and say they're too busy and to carry on without them. ħuman 23:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
So what we see here is that anyone who disagrees or challenges a few members of the original "cabal" are petty, dishonest liars, and in some cases drug abusers. Do you ever consider what such repeated comments to the few who disagree with you guys looks like to the few outsiders looking? Maybe it is time for RW 4.0 and another wiping of the record? --TK/MyTalkRW User #45 00:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- Is there something you want, troll? Otherwise, go back to smearing feces over your own page. --Kels (talk) 00:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)