User talk:67.135.49.198

Hi . Welcome, and thanks for making an edit - though I'm not sure that you fully understand what the site is about. If you'd like to know a bit more about the site please have a look at our RationalWiki:Newcomers' guide as this could clarify things.--Bob^{bing up} 14:16, 1 August 2008 (EDT)

Hi, Jinxmchue! Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 20:28, 17 August 2008 (EDT)

Jinx haz an R-kaiv: - 1 - 2 -

Do you know what?

You are an idiot. You want proof? Just choose any entry at random here and here. Editor at CP^{Oh, Finland! Why?} 12:37, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

You lie, I actually had to randomly choose TWICE to get this. NightFlare^{i haz a talk page.} 12:43, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

Dear Jinx, it has come to my attention that you are a helplessly treasonous extension cord, and that, beyond any doubt, you construct as a favor for extension cords. Have a very treasonous extension cord, and may you be constructed into oblivion by a hoard of extension cords. extension cordspeed! Javasca₧ don't cast the first stone, and I won't throw it back

Peanut wankle knocker argyle drinks. 67.135.49.198 00:20, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

Jinx.... Why don't you just create an account? SirChuckB^{Leave Death Threats Here} 00:36, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

My not creating an account is (much) more important than you. 67.135.49.198 10:12, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

No, it means that you're too bone idle to do so. Silver Sloth 10:15, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

Now why does that sound strangely familiar, Jinx? ^_^ Pink_{(Astronomy Domine)} 10:19, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

I don't know. One of your brain cells is trying to communicate with the other. Rattle your head around. It might help them get together. 67.135.49.198 11:03, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

You know, when a creationist tries to insult someone's intelligence, it's not particularly hurtful, Jinx. Pink_{(Hilarious is what it is!)} 11:15, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

This is like watching sperm whales juggle, please, continue. ArmondikoV^{d hominem} 11:12, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

AHAHAHAHAHA! Is that all you've got? Oh, it is. No wonder your site is the cesspool it is, you mouthbreathers can't even use the small brain you've got and use a decent insult. NightFlare ...tiktaalik might have been found in that deep stratum for either of at least two reasons: [...] It is actually an antediluvian laboratory chimera and hence an out-of-place artifact of a society already known to have been inordinately cruel. 11:21, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

(unindent) Let me say, as the one who started this little topic... It just makes sense... I can see no reason for you to continue using your IP. We already know it's you, you've admitted as much and we have backup in the form of Wikipedia, you're obviously communicating with us so it's not to hide you from the powers that be at CP.... What intelligent reason would you have to not regisitering an account? That's all I'm saying.... I really don't care one way or the other, it's not like it influences my life in any way SirChuckB^{Leave Death Threats Here} 11:55, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

That reminds me, I gotta add stuff to bunchanumber's public userpage! NightFlare You don't see how sometime can estimate when the truth when someone else conceals it???? Godspeed [1] 11:59, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

That it obviously royally pisses you off that I don't register (so much so that you keep bringing it up) is more than enough intelligent reasoning for me to not register. 67.135.49.198 13:31, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

You flatter yourself too much, Mr 67. I doubt that anybody is significantly pissed off (royally or otherwise) that you only appear to us in numerical form. As Sir Chuck said, it really doesn't influence anything whether you register here or not. Take it or leave it. weaseLOId~ 14:02, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Um... yeah, I just brought it up because there seems to be no rational reason not to..... In fact, if you had your own account, you could put whatever crap you wanted to on your user page (within legal limits) and we wouldn't be adding crap on our own... But if you like dancing bananas, that's your business. SirChuckB^{Leave Death Threats Here} 14:33, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Well, people have registered at Conservapedia so why not at least return the favour! I mean, we don't block people for no reason and don't bully and censor people so it's not like you're going to get worse treatment, in fact, it'd be better because RWikians would respect someone wanting to sign up and contribute in positive way. ArmondikoV^{d hominem} 14:50, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

"we don't block people for no reason" lol! "and don't bully" rofl! "and censor people" ROFLMAO!!!! "RWikians would respect someone" *dies laughing* Not a single shred of truth in any of that. Well done! 67.135.49.198 15:54, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

And you show again and again how clever you are. I wonder how someone as clever as you isn't a Sysop yet at CP. Editor at CP^{Oh, Finland! Why?} 16:00, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Hey Jinx, fuck you. Love Ace. Ace McWicked^{cast ye the first stone} 16:02, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Hey Jinx.... do you have any proof that there is no truth to this... Or is it one of those things you magically know? and while we're on it. Tim has page here, TK used to, Ken has a few, we're pretty sure and others from CP have been on both sites at once... and while we're at it.. YOU'RE HERE YOU IDIOT. We could have easily blocked your IP a long time ago... but, unlike Herr Schlafly et al, we allow just about everyone to come here, as long as you're not a vandal. SirChuckB^{Leave Death Threats Here} 16:04, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Ya, what he said. Well, as I tried to be slightly more civil and got laughed at (part expected to be fair), Jinx can go rape his kids again for all I care now. I hope no CP editor does sign up here, I hope they keep posting annonymously or using the Red Telephone, making arses of themselves through childish antics (at least RW childish antics don't pretend to be otherwise, that's the difference). But, at least we know we make coherent posts and don't resort to "ROFLMAO!!!!" like that... ArmondikoV^{d hominem} 16:15, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Oh, I guess you're right. These were all very good reasons for blocking me:

• 17:00, 4 September 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.135.49.198 (Talk) with an expiry time of 30 minutes (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (For my entertainment, as always :))
• 21:47, 1 September 2008 Human (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.135.49.198 (Talk) with an expiry time of 314 sec. (5 minutes) () ‎ (Not using multiple accounts)
• 03:59, 1 September 2008 SusanG (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.135.49.198 (Talk) with an expiry time of 8 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (Please do not unblock - let the wanker sit it out this once. )
• 03:42, 1 September 2008 DLerner (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.135.49.198 (Talk) with an expiry time of 8 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (Past your bedtime, Jinx. Go to sleep. )
• 05:15, 31 August 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.135.49.198 (Talk) with an expiry time of 8 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (Childish insults. Way past your bedtime.)
• 02:27, 28 August 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.135.49.198 (Talk) with an expiry time of 5 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (I said bedtime, little boy.)
• 20:34, 27 August 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.135.49.198 (Talk) with an expiry time of 5 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (Infant games: And the cycle continues!)
• 01:42, 25 August 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.135.49.198 (Talk) with an expiry time of 5 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (I'm awake too, Lerner, but it's *way* past Jinx's bedtime. We can't in good conscience let him continue editing when he should be snoozing.)
• 00:37, 25 August 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.135.49.198 (Talk) with an expiry time of 8 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (Bedtime, Jinxy. No dinner for you, either.)
• 22:02, 20 August 2008 Ace McWicked (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.135.49.198 (Talk) with an expiry time of 60 sec () ‎ (because i dont like you. asshole)

And no bullying going on here:

http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/User:67.135.49.198

Nope. 67.135.49.198 16:25, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Awww... does poor widdle jwixy think he's been hard done by for a 60 second bwock when his [Andrew Schlafly|Mistress] wegularly bwocks people for 5 years or infinity after making next to no edits? ArmondikoV^{d hominem} 16:33, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

<edit conflict>What he said. None of those blocks were for more than a few hours, compared to CP where users are blocked for months or years with no warning. As for the user page, you've already been told that, if you create an account, you can do as you like with your user page (more or less). As long as you continue to respond 'anonymously' as 67.135.etc, you can expect us to amuse ourselves with your page. If you consider a couple dancing bananas to be bullying, then you really have a strange definition of the concept. weaseLOId~ 16:35, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

I love how pretty much all the blocks are from me ^_^

Poor Jinxy... Is that nasty Pink bullying you again? :( Pink_(Bliss) 16:39, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

I just can't wait for the 4 1/2 minutes I slapped on him to end and for more crying, let me taste the tears :). I should have made it even less just to make the point clearer. Can we block for milliseconds? I'd prefer femtosecond blocks just to get the point across but that would be science! ArmondikoV^{d hominem} 16:41, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

More to the point, you realise it's actually perfectly fair to block vandals (that would be you) and trolls (you again), right? Pink_{(It's not too complicated)} 16:46, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Is that better now, Jinx? weaseLOId~ 16:46, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

(3ECs)your block log proves nothing... Have a look at some of the other users block logs... From Mine:

• 07:58, 16 April 2008 Genghis Khant (Talk | contribs | block) blocked SirChuckB (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 314 sec. (5 minutes) (autoblock disabled) ‎ (Daring to ask a question) (unblock)
• 16:05, 19 August 2008 DLerner (Talk | contribs | block) blocked SirChuckB (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 271 sec. ( about 4½ minutes) (account creation disabled) ‎ (If you want to mispell my name go to WP. It's DLERNER! NO FUCKING "A") (unblock)
• 18:00, 26 August 2008 DickTurpis (Talk | contribs | block) blocked SirChuckB (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 3 seconds (account creation disabled) ‎ (disruptive edits at main page talk; contradicting a bureaucrat. use your real first name and last initial.) (unblock)
• 17:42, 5 September 2008 DickTurpis (Talk | contribs | block) blocked SirChuckB (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 271 sec. ( about 4½ minutes) (account creation disabled) ‎ ("You people" have been causing too much trouble on this quality site. It ends now!) (unblock)

Also keep in mind that I don't have a history of vandalizing pages.... Like ::ahem::some people involved in this particular conversation. I know this might be a novel concept for you, considering your site just locks everything down when Andy goes to bed.... But when you have a known vandal who edits at odd times, you don't just let him have free run when most of the Admins are not around to clean it up... And I have a little challenge for you Jason, Mayor of Tenochtitlan, look through the Conservapedia block logs and see how many people have one as extensive as yours is here.... I figure it'll be kind of hard because you guys have this habit of permabanning at the drop of a hat. Moron. SirChuckB^{Leave Death Threats Here} 16:50, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

You know Jinx, I have been blocked here more times than you but I dont wet my pants and cry to mummy about being bullied. I mean, come on dude, man up for fucks sake. You little wet end! Ace McWicked^{cast ye the first stone} 16:52, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Fucking a, but you are dense. I DIDN'T BRING IT UP UNTIL ONE OF YOU MORONS CLAIMED YOU DON'T DO IT!!!! Seriously, do you eat stupid for breakfast every morning or what? 67.135.49.198 17:02, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

D&D

Jinx, haven't enough rounds gone by for you to get another save versus the Feeblemind spell Andy cast on you? --Edgerunner⁷⁶_{Save me Tsisnaajini!} 16:35, 2 October 2008 (EDT)