User talk:Human

This usely to cher is suspas appepets abusiveat in officpupry, and harently uted of socksed pupcial mopetb votes.

Archives for this talk page: Archive list (new)

See the history of vandalism to this article

Hey goobers, it's my talk page!

Just so's you all know, I have a distinct preference for continuing conversations on the talk page they start on. Otherwise my aging brain hurts! (ie, no table tennis conversations, please)

As a confirmed mustard jar for taking on this job as a Sysop on RationalWiki: I pledge to only block users if they ask for it, or insert unfunny vandalism. I furthermore pledge that if I indulge in secret private conversations about you, we will make a formal report to the mob. Is that all? If you impugn my motives without warrant, or challenge my "AUTHORITY", er, there is nothing I can or will do.

Anyone is welcome to nominate editors for demotion to sysop, and discuss the nominations here.
Sysops can summarize the nominations here -96 days until the US signs Kyoto.

please block me, human.

20 minute block please? I really need to cool off, but I don't think I'll be able to without being blocked. Please, save me from myself. --Hoji^die! 18:23, 24 February 2008 (EST)

Done. Hope you relax :) human 18:43, 24 February 2008 (EST)

WIGO talk Archives

Why we gots two archive 25's?
#[[Conservapedia Talk:What is going on at CP?/Archive23|21 January 2008 - 25 January 2008]]
#[[Conservapedia Talk:What is going on at CP?/Archive24|25 January 2008 - 28 January 2008]]
#[[Conservapedia Talk:What is going on at CP?/Archive25|28 January 2008 - 3 February 2008]]
#[[Conservapedia Talk:What is going on at CP?/Archive25|2 February 2008 - 7 February 2008]]
#[[Conservapedia Talk:What is going on at CP?/Archive26|7 February 2008 - 23 February 2008]]

CЯacke® 20:23, 24 February 2008 (EST)

I dunno, but I changed it to automatic. Oh, because you made a second one when you archived? Since I added #26 before going to "archivelinks"? We may have edit-overlapped while you were doing it, too. I wish that "archivelinks" ran a loop instead of repeated code. Also, wouldn't it be cool if it could grab the "last edited" date and list it next to the archive number? human 20:27, 24 February 2008 (EST)

No relation

No relation...yeah that's what I meant. Thanks! Secret Squirrel 22:20, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Glad I got it right... I liked the funzzies of your additions, squirrel person. human 00:06, 26 February 2008 (EST)

Jokez is teh phunny. That's what I like here, you can be as snarky as you want without getting those dreaded <<test2>> <<blatantvandal>> warnings from somebody screaming NPOV Secret Squirrel 07:00, 26 February 2008 (EST)

Hehe, yeah, we're like uncyclopedia, with facts. human 13:59, 26 February 2008 (EST)

Another masterpiece

Yay! I wrote another essay! And this one's actually readable! ...What's with that look? No, I'm not obsessed with women. Whatever gave you that idea? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:18, 26 February 2008 (EST)

Admin abuse

Removing talk page comments: [1]

He then blocked me for re-adding them. Its time for his reign of terror to end. Desysop toulouse. Thanks in advance, DoggedamesP 18:54, 27 February 2008 (EST)

How about if I just block you both for 314 seconds for edit warring, nadhoB? human 19:02, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Hey, how long until TK gets back? DoggedamesP 19:07, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Looks like 4PM March 10 2008. human 19:09, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Why not just unblock him now? DoggedamesP 19:11, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Because he will be unblocked on March 10th, and there is no reason to unblock him any earlier. Regardless of whether his block is just or not, per one of the only concrete policies RationalWiki really has, his block will last a certain period of time. Short of a policy change (which, if you want TK to be unblocked earlier, you should formally propose, instead of just asking about TK's block), TK's block will not be shortened. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 19:21, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Why? human 19:15, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Time served. And rationalwiki needs some excrement, and I'm just the guy to supply it. DoggedamesP 19:16, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Get three sysops to agree with you, and I'll still ignore the idea. human 19:19, 27 February 2008 (EST)

trashing

Hey, you said you wanted it trashed... one of my few actual contributions TmtamesP 16:23, 28 February 2008 (EST)

That's why I copied it to "fun", to preserve your hard work. human 16:25, 28 February 2008 (EST)

Pirates

I ate them all. I ate all the pi 22:53, 1 March 2008 (EST)

Oh hai pi eater. Nice to meet you. Leave some e for me, ktxbai. human 22:59, 1 March 2008 (EST)

Heart Mass blockage

Human, how many IPs would be blocked by range 129.115.28.0/23? In a WIGO entry I wrote "hundreds", but it's best to be accurate, 'cause I honestly had no idea. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 15:13, 4 March 2008 (EST)

I never really learnded that, but I'd guess a thousand or so - .000 to .999 - but it might be 2²³, who knows? Someone who knows will probably chime in. Or you could google "ip range blocks" and you'll find the MW help page easily. human 15:18, 4 March 2008 (EST)

Oy vey! It's so simple! /23 means 23 of the 32 available bits are constant, thus 9 bits of the address are variable. Thus a /23 block address 2^9 or 512 IP addresses. Or to put it another way, an IPv4 address is a series of 4 octets, making a 32 bit number altogether. So:

129.115.28.0 = 

10000001 01110011 00011100 00000000

The /23 masks of the first 23 bits, and leaves the last 9 variable:

10000001 01110011 0001110     0 00000000
-------------------------     ----------
        constant               variable

So, this /23 address hosts from:
10000001 01110011 00011100 00000000
to:
10000001 01110011 00011101 11111111

which is to say from 129.115.28.0 to 129.115.29.255

Alles klar? --Jeεv☭s^{Your signature uses all my CPU time...} 04:21, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Er, sort of. I liked the part where you just came right out and answered "512 IP addresses", but not so much the part where you explained it in detail. But I'll take your word for it that the explanation means what you say it does. : ) -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 16:04, 5 March 2008 (EST)

This advertisment paid for by: The Friends of Uchiha for Sysop Committee

Uchiha is a pinin' for a demotion. After subjecting him to a painful interrogation, I'd like to chip in my support for his sysopship. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:25, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Get one more person to agree and I'll do it now. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 01:32, 5 March 2008 (EST)

I am not really an active person here any more and dont have much experince with the user but after a breif trawl trough his contributions I see no negatives with his sysoship other then an overuse of teh lulz spake. - Icewedge 01:56, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Uchiha for President Sysop! -- ^ytiunegninamuħ   02:23, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Hello, my name is NightFlare and I endorse this product, service and/or movement. NightFlare^{Speak, mortal} 02:37, 5 March 2008 (EST)

I support this nomination. If made sysop, he'll be able to remove the ridiculously hefty and arbitrary ban I've just given him. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן ^{שְׁלֹום}

Wow, I thought we were all sysops. demote him ASAP. PFoster 11:17, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Hey guys, I don't mean to be rude, but uh... I can't actually unblock myself right now (no powerz yet). Just wanted to make sure that was known... 206.248.159.65 13:04, 5 March 2008 (EST)

I just want to point out that, traditionally, wanting to be a janitor is a disqualification. Jes' sayin', is all. human 14:58, 5 March 2008 (EST)

I think we'd have to disqualify half of the cabalists, then. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 15:56, 5 March 2008 (EST)

More specifically, everyone not listed here. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 16:00, 5 March 2008 (EST)

(User rights log); 16:16 . . Pinto's5150 (Talk | contribs | block) (changed group membership for User:Uchiha from (none) to sysop: Per consensus. )

A bit sluggish there in getting around to it. Don't you know you're supposed to be available 24/7? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 19:19, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Userboxen

This user is a member of the pernicious liberal swarm. This user is an evil darwinist/humanist conspirator! This user is a member of the Darwinist-Humanist Cabal devoted to destroying all that is holy. This user is a member of the Darwinist-Humanist Cabal devoted to perverting all that is holy

When you have a chance, I'd like to creat some soft of userbox that says something like "Member of the evil darwinist/humanist conspiracy"---wanna help? User:PalMD

There's the liberal swarm one Susan^purrrrr 16:15, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Sure, I'll help... should we use the atheist fish or shark as the image?

Howzat? If you like I'll save it up. human 17:05, 5 March 2008 (EST)

I can haz random evil doing? May I suggest "Member of the evil darwinist/humanist conspiracy: Taking away your weapon of gun since 2007"? --Jeεv☭s^{Your signature uses all my CPU time...} 17:15, 5 March 2008 (EST)

That's fun too!!!! Meanwhile, I'm battling insane trolls at the blog. Must get weapon of keyboard.-- -PalMD ^{--Unhand me, scoundrel!} 17:17, 5 March 2008 (EST)

I put the boxes in a box in the order they are mentioned. human 18:33, 5 March 2008 (EST)

See ubx user DarwinHuman Susan^purrrrr 18:42, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Request for friend

Timppeli forgot his password, and asked me to ask you if you could delete his account so he can start over. Please? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 19:59, 6 March 2008 (EST)

See my comment at AmesG's talk page. human 20:00, 6 March 2008 (EST)

Darn it. I was almost hoping for an exasperating back-and-forth right there. Killjoy. : ) -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 20:02, 6 March 2008 (EST)

I can always "reset" the password. tmtoulouse ^vex 20:05, 6 March 2008 (EST)

So we have "discovered" an interesting weakness in MW - after a user is renamed, their old name is readily available to anyone who wants to use it. human 20:54, 6 March 2008 (EST)

For instance, this is human logged in as the "new" wikinterpreter... Wikinterpreter 20:56, 6 March 2008 (EST)

Creepy. We should remember this, and whenever someone gets their name changed, tell them to reregister the old name to keep it out of circulation. human 20:57, 6 March 2008 (EST)

Darn you, killjoy! We could've had so much fun confusing the hell out of each other that way! -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:53, 7 March 2008 (EST)

Awesome Magic card is awesome

-- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 19:41, 9 March 2008 (EDT)

Name change

I hereby demand, that what Heidrun has joined shall never be unbound, that you rename TmtamesP 'BohdAnders'. Do it. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן ^{שְׁלֹום}

make it just "Anders". TmtamesP 15:16, 11 March 2008 (EDT)

Quiet fewl. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן ^{שְׁלֹום}

Fine then. I didn't want to pretend to debate Bohdan at user talk:AmesG with you anways.

What? No invitation for me? I rarely get to practice debating with Subaru! EVIL FRUITCAKE! -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:12, 12 March 2008 (EDT)

I just grabbed whoever was obviously on line at the time. No offense intended. Anyone checking recent changes was welcome (I suppose I should have announced it that way?) human 01:09, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

Another random post from your favorite random poster

-- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 06:37, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

As long as I'm spamming you with random posts, have you taken a look at the project I started, RationalWiki:Active users? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 06:37, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

A very quick question...

I'm new to this Wiki and I was just wondering (seeing as I saw you edit(s) on the Liberal Delusions article) if you could tell me if the afformentioned article is humour based? It contains no referencing and seems to point out quite a few of the strong points of liberalism. Can you shed any light for me please? Thanks in advance! --81.105.28.52 06:42, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

Human isn't up right now, but the article in question is indeed intended as humourous. It is mocking an equivalent article on Conservapedia, I believe. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 07:56, 13 March 2008 (EDT)