Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hal Turner"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I'm not even sure what I changed... I made one edit in the middle of the history. '''[[user:human|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"><big>ħ</big>uman</font>]]'''{{User:Human/sigtalk}} 23:32, 7 September 2008 (EDT) | :I'm not even sure what I changed... I made one edit in the middle of the history. '''[[user:human|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"><big>ħ</big>uman</font>]]'''{{User:Human/sigtalk}} 23:32, 7 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
::You shaved out [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Hal_Turner&diff=prev&oldid=201512 an entire paragraph], I believe. {{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 23:33, 7 September 2008 (EDT) | ::You shaved out [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Hal_Turner&diff=prev&oldid=201512 an entire paragraph], I believe. {{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 23:33, 7 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::Well, now, I might have. But so did EV. Let's use those quaint conventions of complete sentences in our articles, at the very least. Starting an article, and all its "paragrpahs", as if the title is the subject of the sentences, is really bad writing. I will re-insert the pp, although I will also fucking Englishify it. Thanks... '''[[user:human|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"><big>ħ</big>uman</font>]]'''{{User:Human/sigtalk}} 23:39, 7 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:39, 8 September 2008
Sorry, Human. Had to restore the original wording. Moar lulz. EVDebs 23:24, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
- I'm not even sure what I changed... I made one edit in the middle of the history. ħuman
23:32, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
- You shaved out an entire paragraph, I believe.
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:33, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
- Well, now, I might have. But so did EV. Let's use those quaint conventions of complete sentences in our articles, at the very least. Starting an article, and all its "paragrpahs", as if the title is the subject of the sentences, is really bad writing. I will re-insert the pp, although I will also fucking Englishify it. Thanks... ħuman 23:39, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
- Well, now, I might have. But so did EV. Let's use those quaint conventions of complete sentences in our articles, at the very least. Starting an article, and all its "paragrpahs", as if the title is the subject of the sentences, is really bad writing. I will re-insert the pp, although I will also fucking Englishify it. Thanks... ħuman
- You shaved out an entire paragraph, I believe.