Difference between revisions of "RationalWiki:What is going on at ASK?"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(this is WIGO addison, not WIGO acionyx)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
===April 2009===
 
===April 2009===
 
<!--POST NEXT ENTRY HERE-->
 
<!--POST NEXT ENTRY HERE-->
 +
<vote poll=ask26>AddisonDM with on the [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/Talk:Feasibility_of_the_Great_Flood Daily Lulz] show: [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=Talk:Feasibility_of_the_Great_Flood&diff=prev&oldid=8459 You're using my own arguments against me! Not fair! Oh, and that bit about birds perching on the roof of the ark? Couldn't have happened. Carnivores ate grain before the flood, that's how Noah fed them. Since you argued about the fish surviving, you can't argue about how, if they did survive, god would manage to kill them all.] Logical response: [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=Talk%3AFeasibility_of_the_Great_Flood&diff=8471&oldid=8460 Then what about the dove? Doves are pigeons, you know. Chameleons wouldn't have evolved to be hyper-sensitive in 6,000 years. Oh, and that bit about carnivores eating grain? I thought we were talking about after the Fall.]</vote>
 
<vote poll=ask25>AddisonDM on <!-- Can we update this link to the SES app we'll be putting on RW? I have forgotten who has it. -->[http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:Draft_Conservapedia_Application_to_Become_SES_Provider ASchlafly's SES application:] [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:AddisonDM&curid=141&diff=8398&oldid=8394 "frankly, it's not as ridiculous a project as RW likes to claim."] Laugh track in 3... 2...</vote>
 
<vote poll=ask25>AddisonDM on <!-- Can we update this link to the SES app we'll be putting on RW? I have forgotten who has it. -->[http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:Draft_Conservapedia_Application_to_Become_SES_Provider ASchlafly's SES application:] [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:AddisonDM&curid=141&diff=8398&oldid=8394 "frankly, it's not as ridiculous a project as RW likes to claim."] Laugh track in 3... 2...</vote>
 
<vote poll=ask24>Since [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=Talk:Feasibility_of_the_Great_Flood&diff=next&oldid=8427 koalas aren't really "bears"], then ''maybe'' they didn't come from a proto-bear [[baramin]].  Didn't I tell you we were [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=Talk:Feasibility_of_the_Great_Flood&curid=1223&diff=8427&oldid=8424 making this sh*t up as we went]?</vote>
 
<vote poll=ask24>Since [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=Talk:Feasibility_of_the_Great_Flood&diff=next&oldid=8427 koalas aren't really "bears"], then ''maybe'' they didn't come from a proto-bear [[baramin]].  Didn't I tell you we were [http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=Talk:Feasibility_of_the_Great_Flood&curid=1223&diff=8427&oldid=8424 making this sh*t up as we went]?</vote>

Revision as of 03:10, 4 April 2009

Template:AOTW Navigation Add your observations on what is happening at A Storehouse of Knowledge here.

Same rules as WIGO CP. New items at the top, archive when it gets big.

Always be wary of Poe's Law - if something seems too outrageous to be true, it often is. If you see an entry that you think is questionable add {{poe}} to it.

If you decide to join up there, you might want to consider signing the RW Moles Declaration.


What is going on?

April 2009

upneutraldown
-12AddisonDM with on the Daily Lulz show: You're using my own arguments against me! Not fair! Oh, and that bit about birds perching on the roof of the ark? Couldn't have happened. Carnivores ate grain before the flood, that's how Noah fed them. Since you argued about the fish surviving, you can't argue about how, if they did survive, god would manage to kill them all. Logical response: Then what about the dove? Doves are pigeons, you know. Chameleons wouldn't have evolved to be hyper-sensitive in 6,000 years. Oh, and that bit about carnivores eating grain? I thought we were talking about after the Fall.
upneutraldown
12AddisonDM on ASchlafly's SES application: "frankly, it's not as ridiculous a project as RW likes to claim." Laugh track in 3... 2...
upneutraldown
3Since koalas aren't really "bears", then maybe they didn't come from a proto-bear baramin. Didn't I tell you we were making this sh*t up as we went?
upneutraldown
4How does all this baramin stuff work? Well sh*t man, we're just making it up as we go.
upneutraldown
11Anti-science at aSK, courtesy of PJR: ID is a scientific theory, and Dawkins doesn't like it for religious reasons. ID doesn't get a chance because scientists disagree with it for religious reasons. The "Wedge Strategy" doesn't prove ID is religious. "Global Flood" points fossils toward ID. I propose aSK be "anti-Science Knowledge."
upneutraldown
-16People will miss out on art, television, agriculture, biology, philosophy, entertainment and more.
upneutraldown
14Criticizing an idea you don't understand is a bad thing. Therefore, PJR will stop talking about evolution aaaaany time now.
upneutraldown
5Pointing you at material supporting ID is not my department, even though that's sorta the point of the whole wiki.
upneutraldown
15Welcome to Bizarro World, where an organism adapting to better survive in a hostile environment, and in the process becoming less able to compete with other varieties in their enviroments, is evidence against evolution.
upneutraldown
5Fall down gets his first block at aSK. Update: In LowKey's evaluation, only one of these edits is vandalism; the other one is "sensible."

March 2009

upneutraldown
-17Acionyx wisely inexplicably lamely leaves his upcoming epic brilliant witty scathing boring Parthian shot in his sandbox. Nobody cares.
upneutraldown
-13CUR manages to actually score a good point for once (I know, I'm scared too). If animals, plants and even trees survived the Flood on "floating mats of vegetation", what's to keep those wicked humans from doing the same?
upneutraldown
18A.Fox (what a subtle name, whoever could it be?) makes his feelings clear to kindly Unca Ed.
upneutraldown
6Say guys, don't Old Earth Creationists consider their fantasies to be Biblical too? You guys aren't the only ones with a claim on an old anthology to back up their nutty ideas, you know.
upneutraldown
12Following in PJR's footsteps - Fox gives us a brief rundown on his experiences as a conservapedia administrator
upneutraldown
8Ken talks da gud engliches, ya ya!
upneutraldown
7The gang gets all pumped up refuting the Global Flood. Little Philip is not happy. While we're down, everybody makes themselves at home at Acionyx's, while Historian and Theemperor play chess.
upneutraldown
11Let's see, there's enough water to drown the earth hidden somewhere that we can't find, somehow the oceans got saltier within a pretty short time without killing all the fish, plesiosaurs are probably still alive, and the dates of Chinese and Egyptian civilizations are totally wrong. But PJR's not anti-science, nosir!
upneutraldown
18This just in: Ken is really bad at masking his identity. What, you knew that?
upneutraldown
4Plz to not be tracking reality all over our nice clean wiki, kthxbye.
upneutraldown
10And you were doing so well up to point 2.
upneutraldown
-1Absolutely right, Phil. You both claim to have science behind you. Trouble is, only one of you actually does, can you guess who?
upneutraldown
13ASK gets a rousing start, separating itself from CP by adding Argumentum ad populum right off the bat.
upneutraldown
-27Same old Schlafly.(Warning: Poe's Law in action!)
upneutraldown
34March 24, 2009: Philip J. Rayment gets his project off the ground! Most of the cabal immediately join, along with parodists pretending to be prominent Conservapedia sysops.