CreationWiki
Although it is not immediately apparent, CreationWiki differs from its sister site Conservapedia in that it is not meant to be read as a parody. Although it contains the same mixture of half truths, outright lies and deliberate distortions, its authors, sadly, hope it will be taken seriously.
It has a medium-sized article on Conservapedia [1] but nothing on RationalWiki. While it considers hyperlinking to RationalWiki to be illegal, the same word is not susceptible to damnatio memoriae in the way that it is on Conservapedia. [2]
Non-creationists are not allowed to edit content on CreationWiki.[3] Apparently, the same editors are subject to being grouped in to a secret classification, known as "limited."[4] The class cannot be discussed, and the user with "limited" rights may not inquire as to what the status actually is.[5]
It also has an article on (or more properly a side-by-side "refutation" of an article from) EvoWiki [6] along with a link to the site.
References
- ↑ http://creationwiki.org/Conservapedia
- ↑ See the userpage of one RationalWiki admin on CreationWiki, here.
- ↑ CreationWiki administrator "Ashcraft" says as much, here.
- ↑ RationalWiki editors are almost immediately grouped into this section. AmesG, Wikinterpreter, and Alien have all suffered the same fate.
- ↑ CreationWiki administrator Tmajor blanks a discussion of the status, here, over the objections of another administrator.
- ↑ http://creationwiki.org/Creation_%28EvoWiki%29
See also
You can help RationalWiki by expanding it.