Conservapedia:What is going on at CP?

Trus me Conservapedia

Introduction

Newcomer's Guide What is going on?

Commentary

Best of Conservapedia Blatant plagiarism Differences with Wikipedia Hijacked articles "SDG" "TZB" "Fab Five" Sysops Timeline CP in the media

In-depth analysis

Active users Illustrated guide

Fun

Article Matrix Greatest Insights Parthian Shots v - t - e

Keep up to date with all the insanity at extremist Christian conservative blog Conservapedia right here. This page is for rolling reports of the strange, contradictory or humorous activity at Conservapedia. 

Archives: - June 2007 -- July 2007 -- August 2007 -- September 2007 -- October 2007 -- November 2007 -- December 2007 -- January 2008 -- February 2008 -- March 2008 -- April 2008 -- welshmanps -- May 2008 -- June 2008 -- July 2008 -- August 2008 -- Vote data -- September 2008 -- October 2008 -- November 2008 -- Ken 80k LOL -- December 2008 -- January 2009 -- Instructions -- February 2009 -- March 2009 -- Archive list -- April 2009 -- May 2009 -- June 2009 -- July 2009 -- August 2009 -- September 2009 -- October 2009 -- November 2009 -- December 2009 -- January 2010 -- February 2010 -- March 2010 -- April 2010 -- Sandbox -- May 2010 -- June 2010 -- July 2010 -- August 2010 -- September 2010 -- October 2010 -- November 2010 -- December 2010 -- January 2011 -- February 2011 -- March 2011 -- April 2011 -- May 2011 -- June 2011 -- July 2011 -- August 2011 -- September 2011 -- October 2011 -- November 2011 -- December 2011 -- January 2012 -- February 2012 -- March 2012 -- April 2012 -- May 2012 -- June 2012 -- July 2012 -- August 2012 -- September 2012 -- October 2012 -- November 2012 -- December 2012 -- January 2013 -- February 2013 -- March 2013 -- April 2013 -- May 2013 -- June 2013 -- July 2013 -- August 2013 -- September 2013 -- October 2013 -- November 2013 -- December 2013 -- January 2014 -- February 2014 -- March 2014 -- April 2014 -- May 2014 -- June 2014 -- July 2014 -- August 2014 -- September 2014 -- October 2014 -- November 2014 -- December 2014 -- January 2015 -- February 2015 -- March 2015 -- April 2015 -- May 2015 -- June 2015 -- July 2015 -- August 2015 -- September 2015 -- October 2015 -- November 2015 -- December 2015 -- January 2016 -- February 2016 -- March 2016 -- April 2016 -- May 2016 -- June 2016 -- July 2016 -- August 2016 -- September 2016 -- October 2016 -- November 2016 -- December 2016 -- January 2017 -- February 2017 -- March 2017 -- April 2017 -- May 2017 -- June 2017 -- July 2017 -- August 2017 -- September 2017 -- October 2017 -- November 2017 -- December 2017 -- November 2018 -- October 2018 -- September 2018 -- August 2018 -- July 2018 -- June 2018 -- May 2018 -- April 2018 -- March 2018 -- February 2018 -- January 2018 -- December 2018 -- January 2019 -- February 2019 -- March 2019 -- April 2019 -- May 2019 -- June 2019 -- July 2019 -

There are are other places where we Chronicle Conservapedia Craziness:

• All-time classics worth preserving for eternity should be removed from this page and entered at Best of Conservapedia. The new "up/down" voting system is how we are going to try to pick what should go there.
• Much of the insanity relates to users foolishly thinking they can add sane material, or, worse yet, argue with the powers that be. They are usually banned quickly, and often in fascinating ways. See Conservapedia:Banwatch for articles of this sort.

Please add new contributions to this list at the top, and try to copy the formatting carefully so the polls work properly. Each new entry gets an ID number one higher than the previous one.

Note to Readers: Due to conservative deceit, some page links from this page to Conservapedia may be broken.

Please do not remove items from the list unless you believe they are legally slanderous or otherwise likely to be detrimental to RW. Any items you think unworthy of inclusion should be discussed on the talk page. Comment out (<!-- WIGO-->) if you think it's really necessary. "one man's boredom is another man's lulz."

What is going on?

• Ah, my home town of Cambridgewark! Yes, Conservapedia. You're number one at fail.
• Why is Lyin' Ed so reluctant to answer a simple question? Does he perhaps realize he's been caught out? Update 1: Wow, dishonesty is as natural for breathing to Ed, who after implicitly accusing an editor of being dishonest then proceeds to blocks the user for "personal remarks" for this edit that didn't actually contain any. ...so you either made stuff up... = accusation of lying in the conservaverse. Will Conservative logic lead to ... you claimed I Am lying ... prove I am! Update 2: Oh, the deceit! "Honest" Ed blocks the user at 9:38, but only two minutes later posts that he is too soft-hearted to issue a block himself and will let someone else do his dirty work. Update 3: Even PJR doesn't understand the block.
• Oh Fuk! The drawbacks of content filters but PJR shows you how to get around them.
• Ed, you should really lay off the Christian Fun Punch and READ YOUR DAMN POSTS, YOU SOUND LIKE AN IDIOT
• Apparently, complaining about the sysops' overuse of the banhammer to win arguments is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
• Crocoite makes it very clear: "You see a sysop abusing his power? LOOK AWAY. Also, don't complain about the Liberal [noun] articles. CP is a conservative site, and that means that we're bashing liberals and proud of it. Conservative bias is GOOD."
• Yes, Ed, it's funny, but you're editing a fucking encyclopedia article.
• Nope, not fascist at all, no sir.
• Conservative still doesn't know about the preview button, so fuck it all.
• Some headlines are so incredibly important, they have to be posted twice! Update: Go, Fox!
• You'd think Ed "Let me tell you for the billionth time how I was one of Wikipedia's earliest editors and am an expert on wikis" Poor would know how wikis work by now. Update: Planet Earth calling Ed... do you copy?
  • GASP* Fox not only wiped "liberal tools" - he now claims that the "liberal" in "Liberal Christianity" does not imply a political agenda! Will Andy be pleased?
• I guess Ed didn't have his coffee this morning: "[Natural selection] is a 'theory', and not universally accepted" - "Oops!" Update: As usual, liberals are to blame somehow.
• Hypocrisy, Ed has it: "Assume good faith"
• Beware the Ides of March! Oh noes, hang on a moment we're having technical difficulties!
• When parody becomes reality. Update: gone.
• Hilarious timing, activate! 1) DHayes makes several good points (though he's wordy). 2) He makes himself useful and notifies Conservative of an error. 3) He gets a 1-day Croco block for whining. 4) Conservative fixes the error and repeatedly thanks him. Update: Jimmy notifies Conservative and gets a 1-day "Mind Your Own Business" Croco block. TomMoore brings up Jimmy's block and also gets a 1-day "Mind Your Own Business" Croco block - quoting Girl Genius: "Dis is turnink into vun of dose plans... hyu know - de kind vere ve keel everybody dot notices dot ve's killin' people?"
• DanH reminds us how our castles are made of paper.
• Looks like poor Ed Poor's mommy and daddy didn't love him enough
• Another high quality article from Ed.
• Just some minor Lulz: Yeah, this is exactly what people think of when they think of someone "coming out"
• Andrew Schlafly, not at all jealous of Barack Obama. Not even a little bit. JEALOUS indeed, yup, of his "peer", once upon a time, at the Harvard Law Review.
• MetcalfeM told it like it is. UPDATE: No, he didn't.UPDATE: YES. HE. DID!!! and no one is really surprised by this

UPDATE some more: Looks like some other folks are joining him in pointing out the Emperor's Wardrobe is a bit lacking.

• Difference 15: CP will not monitor other blogs and sites. That's why DanH totally didn't monitor Feebasfactor's WP account.
• It took just... 14 hours, but one CP sysop at least realized that Fox has left the building. Update: More people notice. In the meantime, Andy... has other concerns.
• They're not even trying to hide their ideology-pushing anymore: DanH asks why anybody should give a non-ideological reason for censoring the fact that Himmler, Marx and Oscar Wilde were homeschooled. UPDATE The deletions are reverted as they contradict

Difference 9: "Wikipedia editors who are far more liberal than the American public frequently censor factual information. Conservapedia does not censor any facts that comport with the basic rules." Of course DanH deletes again and keeps shtum on his justification. Shame on you Dan!

• Crocoite takes Conservapedia one step closer to the Scarlet Letter. Wear your badges with pride, friends.
• Andy makes it clear that anything he's never heard of is liberal and deceitful. But wait... PWNED! Turns out many winners are reverends and rabbis (including Billy Graham), and include people such as everyone favorite "liberal" Chuck Colson.
• PJR and Ed cite Robert Turkel Sheila Rangslinger J.P. Holding to defend the whole "Bible does not claim that Pi equals 3" thing? Oh yeah, that explains a lot...
• Dear Joaquín: We know that Conservative really loves to brag with Google rankings, and we know that Ed loves being praised for his silly achievements... but you're grasping at straws here. The more obscure the search term, the higher its ranking.
• Fox deletes his User and Talk pages & protects them. Is he going? UPDATE He may be away for some time!
• I have a new homework assignment for you, kids - it's called "write and think what I tell you to write and think." You may choose your pre-approved, ideologically vetted topic from here before turning to our textbook, my mother's unintelligible screed.
• Ed reaches into the Hivemind and pulls out another liberal gem! Update: is it just me or is Ed a total douche tonight?
• Read the last sentence in cp:Flying Spaghetti Monster. Does this mean Conservapedia finally admits Intelligent Design is based in Christianity? (If that's not immediately clear, read the original letter that spawned Pastafarianism - it makes no mention of Christianity, just Intelligent Design.)
• Liberals don't believe in law and order, and leads to a lawless society. Except some liberals do come down real hard on law and order. Explain that, Andy? Oh, they're only doing it to further their own careers.
• Now Ed is really taking the piss. Update: Fox agrees and consigns it to the memory hole.
• Mommy! Ed's not sycophantic at all!
• Oh my. Footnote #1 on Conservapedia's article on the hate group, Christian Identity, groups Phyllis Schlafly and Eagle Forum with other white supremacists and fear-mongering hate traders. While I admit it's no surprise, it is a surprise to see it on Conservapedia!
• Ed Poor is at it again. He just can't help showing off what a great worker he is to his beloved idol. Four dozen new articles! That's a total of about...well... sixty sentences.
• Remember, according to CP Commandment 5, you must never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever put in personal opinion, or you might get blocked.
• The latest of Ed Poor's assignments.
• Little-by-little, inch-by inch, Anakin Skywalker becomes Darth Vader.
• It's finally happened. Conservapedia has become the Simpsons' satirical vision of fundamentalists, as Ed Poor objects to Michelangelo's David.
• If you're left of ASchlafly (which probably includes most Republicans) you're in league with Islamic Terrorists Fox (our home grown tame Israelophile) has a different take on it: you're anti Israeli.
• Achtung! Either you voluntarily drink the Kool-aid® or you will be shot! That is all.
• C'mon Andy--stop beating around the bush and tell us how you really feel.
• "petty" - (adj) See: Andrew Schlafly
• And some people still wonder why so few people contribute to CP: A new guy isn't happy with Ed's global warming whitewashing in the "Polar bear" article and rewrites it after leaving a lengthy complaint. Ed takes it like a true CP sysop and waves his fist in the guy's general direction.
• A reader asks ... (Editorial v Encyclopaedic) further A hitherto line following editor takes issue.
• It's diffs like this one that really show that Wikipedia's NPOV/BLP policies aren't such a bad idea.
• Ed points out that a talk page is not for putting down other contributiors. Will Karajou or Andy heed his advice?
• Ahh... Conservative Hypocrisy
• As usual, Andy is ignorant about his own rules, even after they're pointed out to him.
• Barikada's toeing a dangerous line by pointing out that when the Bible gets something mathematically wrong, it's apparently an estimate, while other numerical estimates are exact measurements of the world's age. Hopefully the largely defensive weapon of ban won't hit him before this plays out to its hilarious conclusion.
• How fast they forget: DanH has issues with a "Look how biased things are!" graph that uses the exact same method that CP's "six times more liberal" claim is based on: Self-identification.
• I'm gonna go ahead and assume that Steve doesn't Date Much
• Bohdan has been hanging out with us too long: "I actually don't think that the 'Liberal ____' articles are very encyclopedic."
• Abortion and prostitution? Yeah, they're pretty much the same thing.
• Poe's Law, Part 23. But no longer. Apparently, Fox mean this. Remains to be seen how Andy feels.
• So little text, so much WTF: Why does CP's "Prince" article redirect to "Prince (musician)"? Why doesn't CP have any real article on what a prince is? Why is the second sentence dedicated to pointing out that he's a Jehovah's Witness? And why is the third sentence describing Machiavelli's "The Prince"? Update: Fox is on strike
• It's good to archive old stuff from your talk page, just don't forget to leave all the pats on the back from Andy when you do!
• Was I alone in imagining Boy scouts hiring fireworks at extortionate prices? (Boy Scouts rent skyrockets ...)
• Stalin believed in evolution, therefore, evolution is evil. Right Karajou?
• Yes Andy, faith is a uniquely Christian concept. I guess the beliefs of Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and all other religions count for nothing in the eyes of a few select individuals
• Andy's reading comprehension is lacking again.
• People who make sense look out of place on CP. Case in point: DanH deletes "Liberal sarcasm" because "Sarcasm" exists. In the meantime: Liberal Bias, Liberal Christianity, Liberal Hypocrisy, Liberal values, Liberal ideology...
• Andy resurrects an old RobS favorite - feigned ignorance.
• Anybody fancy a little Karajou baiting? Update: Pointing out that somebody in the US Military did something bad and using the same sweeping generalization Andy used = "liberal sarcasm" 3-day block - Yay, double standards! And then PhoenixWright comes to the rescue, but bites another three day block.
• Crocoite is concise! Two Lulz in a one-line reply: 1) "Feel free to add fact tags... so that Andy can ban you." and 2) "Don't revert stuff you don't agree with - only sysops are allowed to do that!"
• pr0n beats out a minister's son any day. Can't argue with Schlafly stats!
• All sorts of things "happen" when sysops (and owners) can't read diffs correctly. Then again it's probably a case of being a thorn in the side.
• Iduan (about "Academy Award"): "This is a combo of bad grammar and a copy from Wikipedia" - Joaquín Martínez: "So what?"
• Crocoite begins to see a flaw in the great plan to have dozens of articles about the evils of liberals: People suddenly add them all to "Category:Liberals"! Quickly realizing that he's not arguing from a good position, he now tries to change the rules of the game... or is he actually discussing something else? Dude, phrase your proposals less vaguely!
• Dear Fox: Thanks again for your efforts with unbanning some of us. The gesture is much appreciated, but you made an unfortunate mistake in your reasoning. You said: "There was no vandalism, no obscenities, just disagreement. We are - I hope - all adult enough here to accept dissent. My take is that so long as you don't attempt to "corrupt" an article, you are free to edit here." Unfortunately, you forgot about a certain someone who does not tolerate anybody disagreeing with His Andyness. :(
• Confronted with Enron and Nixon, Andy promptly redefines "deceit": Any "run-of-the-mill political lies or fraud" are not deceit!
• Read your sources: Andy: "Government finally admits it: vaccines can cause autism." Source: "Significantly, the government's decision says nothing about whether vaccines cause autism."
• I'll take "Insane and Absurd Claims" for 400, Alex: "Embraced deceit is common among liberals, but non-existent among conservatives." Proof? Why, just look at all the carefully selected examples Andy presents in the Deceit article!
• Radioactive decay: Andy "cleared out some bias and speculation here" By reversing the meaning entirely.
• Feebasfactor's gotta be a Troll; there could be no better demonstration of No True Scotsman! UPDATE is Andy reading WIGO?
• So is Andy Pandy's use of 'high quality' either a prime example of Newspeak or just plain old Liberal grading?
• PalMD's first steps on CP after being unbanned: Karajou and Andy still don't like an actual doctor speaking about medical issues. Always remember #14 of this list: "We do not drive away experts by pretending that some random anonymous user who just signed up is as knowledgeable and authoritative as a scholar with decades of experience in teaching or research." Right, Andy. Right. Update: Assfly claims to know more about medicine than a doctor because he talks to physicians regularly. Update update: Palmd001, not a doctor.
• Poe's law strikes again....
• When will America be saved from the dangerous scourge of Professors? And did you know?? Among professors, "there have been a relatively large number of shocking crimes and bizarre conduct"!! ^{[Citation Not Needed]}
• Andy Schlafly - Ladies' Man or creepy luster? Remember Andy, lust is a sin.
• Andy's ego gets in the way of his project yet again. After blocking a user because nobody else happened to be editing at the time, the editor explains himself, only to be met with a fuck you by Andy. UPDATE: pwned. UPDATED UPDATE: doubled pwned, and it goes on but Andy's got the I'm an ignorant asshole defense to fall back on. Final(?) Update: Karajou sweeps in and bans him for "disrespect to the site and Aschlafly".
• Fuck women's rights.
• Well, it's taken some time but Guns in schools has arrived. (and here's a piccy. Relevance?
• Is Asswipe trying to amuse? IMHO!
• Rock slamming the irony meter!
• What's a more important news story than terrorism, illegal immigration, a school shooting, and anti-semitism? Why, a (Mormon) dancer's virginity, of course.
• More anti-semitism at CP. Despite being informed of the Jerusalem school shooting, Crocko'shite largely ignores it and it is left to Fox to add it to the Breaking News section some fifteen hours later. And Crock wonders why people don't like Mormons.
• It's not an illusion, and it's not April 1; this is real: Fox unbans Wikinterpreter and even apologizes! UP-FREAKING-DATE: Paging PalMD...
• Karajou, professional mind reader. (Apparently, the block happened because of this simple content discussion...)
• Mwa! Ha! Hah! ROTFL. "This is a High..." Sorry I can't go on.
• Yes, it's a pet peeve: Not even ANDY, the Supreme Commander of his blog site knows how to move an article the right way. <rant>Seriously, what good is it to restrict the Move right to people who don't know how to use it? Then again, Andy doesn't like history transparency, so we shouldn't be surprised...</rant> Note: Andy conveniently forgot to move the original talk page - I wonder why...
• Conservapedia brings out the rednecks.
• Croc-o-ite, noun (2007) - see, pwned. Update: being pwned on all sides, Crocoite lashes out, blocks one user, gets called out on that, and blocks another. What would Jesus do? Probably kill all witnesses, apparently. Update #2: Crocoite is a toddler.
• After a lovely Parthian shot, Azariphale returns! But for how long, before the insanity gets to him again? Update: About 6 hours, since you ask.
• Andy gets called out for quote mining. Will his head asplode? Update: The replies are in: Crocoite foams at the mouth while Andy simply asserts and re-asserts that he is right.
• Jazz, improving censoring Andy's crap high-quality contributions and then calling it "blog-style language" while asking for sources is NOT the best way to get Edit rights.
• Ed complains that the "Unisex movement" article is unbalanced because it "just has two opposition quotes". Hilarity: He added both quotes!
• Nitpicking is fun: TerryH copy-pastes CreationWiki's "Sun" entry. He claims it's okay because it was "originally written by" him and "does not include alterations made by others on that site" - too bad that that's not true.
• Assfly keeps going with his "Hollywood Values", first implying that Sharon Tate must have had it coming (does this make Manson the agent of God's justice?), then by stating that by "valuing" anything that leads to death, liberals value death itself. What does this say about "Military Values", I wonder?
• It's spot the difference time! This is Conservapedia's article on John McCain in September 2007. Can you spot the cunningly subtle changes those CP folk have made in the current version?
• More paraphrasing of PJR: "How could anyone possibly object to people telling Hindus that their beliefs are bullshit? Obviously my irrational superstitions are correct, and it is imperative that everyone understand this." And you wonder why these guys were ever fed to the lions. Update: PJR provides a Reader's Digest version of the above
• Shorter PJR: I'm as scared of Andy as you are.
• Conservative fairy tales go like this: "The liberal hero slaughters the poor, innocent dragon for money. No, not to save the fair maiden or rescue a village. Money."
• Ever since his 1-day block, PhoenixWright is somewhat bitter and speaks his mind - word of wisdom: Just because your name is Phoenix doesn't mean that you're going to rise from the ashes once the sysops burn your account to a crisp.
• TerryH demonstrates that CP sysops are not appointed based on their people skills.
• We're all looking forward to Andy's explanation of how his ripping off an AP wire picture constitutes Fair Use. Ah, IP laws, who needs 'em?
• BREAKING NEWS: Andy was abducted by Liberals Aliens, and they left a cheap imitation in his place. You can easily tell - the clone made a joke that's actually halfway funny and not anti-liberal!
• Proving once again that genuine nut-jobs and parodists are hard to distinguish. Oh, and it's usually a pretty bad sign when you defend yourself against quote mining accusations before even posting a single quote. Kinda like yelling "I DID NOT KILL HIM! IT WAS AN ACCIDENT!" when a cop walks past you.
• Words of wisdom from Ed Poor about Vietnam POWs and Abu Ghraib. (Someone claims it's all Moral Relativism.)
• Good grief, utter rubbish; needs rewrite, Will the Foxmuppet be man enough to do the same with the utter rubbish The Assfly, PJR or Kajagook produce? Or will he remain a tool helping to disguise Andy's blog as an encyclopedia?
• "Don't call ME a plagiarist" Kajagoogoo BANHAMMERS SSchultz. Turns out he was one of ours. Update: Barikada stands toe-to-toe with Petty Officer cum schoolyard bully Karajou. Time stands still.
• User:DLerner Tells Andy about reality.
• The only thing you'll ever need to know about this concept is that evilutionist lieberal athiest demoncrats can't explain it. UPDATE: PJR settles things "right".
• A user asks Andy a hypothetical question about Islamic prayer in school. Andy dodges the question and fires back a broadside of non-sequiturs. Additionally, his logic is so catastrophically flawed it requires new terms. The post-hoc fallacy is pretty well known, but Andy now gives us the "pre-hoc fallacy": abolishing school prayer not only meant no more geniuses afterwards, but for 100 years before as well.
• Ed, it's wonderful that you love Wikipedia, but still, "do not cite wikis as sources".
• Oh Noes!!!! We've had Liberal this, Liberal that & Liberal t'other, are we witnessing the beginning of Atheist fever? (Also, Andy: The Manual of Style would like to have a word with you)Update Such patriotism!.
• Quality Lulz bordering on the edge of an okay article: The Titius-Bode Law has been disproven by the discovery of Neptune, but that only means "that God in fact set the planets in their orbits according to this Law, but a subsequent cataclysmic event or sequence significantly altered the elegant mathematical pattern of the outer reaches of the solar system." (Oh; & it's the orbit's semi major axis: not the planet's)
• Pop quiz! What does "class" mean? A group of schoolchildren? Socioeconomic strata? A taxonomic level? If you guessed an obscure clause in the Constitution, you'd be right! (Likewise, the CP definition of "answer" is somewhat narrow, too.)
• Wonderboy Karajou to the rescue! Banning Saving us from the evils of helpful, unobjectionable category edits mass category changes! And thank God mass reverting edits is perfectly okay! [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

Update: Karajou blocks hundreds of IP addresses to save us from this evil scourge of good faith edits!

• Another poor sap makes the mistake of asking for an explanation from Andy as to why all his hard work has been de-liberaled, without realising that asking such a thing of Andy is about as effective as asking a baby why it poops itself. Update: one day off for apparently not kow-towing to Andy's unexplained reversions. RESPECT OUR DEMIGOD, FOOL!
• User:IntofSci has made the greatest of mistakes, he has edited Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons to reflect reality, how long will he last? Update:17 hours, 35 minutes.
• Alright; this should be in "According to" but look who it is pontificating about that immigrant and the bus crash. (It's Mommy)
• Thugs hurl butter at whalers. Pity it wasn't potatoes (see 6 wigos earlier).
• You don't agree with forcing children to pray in class? Religious censorship! Help! I'm being repressed!
• Spelling lessons with Andrew Schlafly: In the UK, you spell it "humourous". In the US, you spell it "humorous". On CP, you're apparently supposed to spell it "humous". (Also, Lolcandy, it's a good idea when schoolin' peeps on the their spelig to not make too many errors yourself: "across" has only on "c", indeed! But don't worry, whoever points it out will get reverted and blocked)
• Burning the evidence is now called "routine cleaning" - yep, that sure sounds nicer than "erasing all evidence of me censoring people who asked uncomfortable questions"!
• Ed asks a good question. The answer, of course, is "nothing". Feminists actually like women.
• Confronted with evidence that one of the Quality Articles is copied from Wikipedia, Andy has the ultimate defense: WP copied it from the same source! Which is still entirely wrong.
• Karajou posts a long article, including a reference to a hilarious naval incident. Wow, I learned and laughed at something on Conservapedia! Maybe I've been wrong about this place. Oh, wait. It's a complete copy and paste job. Thanks, Karajou!
• Crocoite's hard-on for copy-pasting headlines from his favorite anti-liberal blogs meets Andy's hard-on for contests: Behold... the News Contest!
• Ed's articles are indeed high quality, compared to this non-article by CPWebmaster (who needed three edits to get it into this state).
• And today's word is: "awesome"!
• Another high-quality article by a Conservapedia sysop. I've seen parodists putting more work into their articles. Update: Ed's on a run! (Granted, that version is better than his first one...)(and just look at the edit comment on this one. Sycophancy anyone?)
• I'm pretty sure that's supposed to be, it takes a village including the parents, not instead of. But hey, we already knew Andy was a literalist.
• Let us begin the war against pants
• Lies by Republican politicians are not deceit
• A Scot defends his country. UPDATE: Dates may be not only "incorrect," but "ideological."
• The modern liberal is known by his affection for cocaine and prostitutes. Apparently the modern liberal is Bender the Robot. Or Rush Limbaugh.
• Crocodile's gonna turn Conservapedia into the Mormon Book of all knowledge.
• Ben Schumin's contributions on Liberal Obstruction, Liberal Vandalism, Liberal Relativism, Category:Liberal Mental Conditions were regarded as parody by many editors but perhaps not Andy?
• Conservapedia Editors! We invite you to make suggestions when you encounter poor articles, and if appropriate, we'll take swift action to correct our mistakes. You will NOT suffer any consequences for pointing out errors in The Trustworthy Encyclopedia. (The article was formerly titled 'New gay plague').
• Oh noes! We've run out of good articles to feature. Time to get out the repeats.
• The Trusworthy Encyclopedia now encourages wild, unsourced literature interpretation based on personal opinions: "people who lie the most" are, of course, liberals - and they're also monsters. Coming up next: "The snake in the Garden of Eden was the first liberal!"
• What's going on? Apparently the Soviet Union still (for a while longer at least). In case you were wondering how an article this good appeared this quickly visit Wikipedia.
• Bisexual? What's that?
• Liam Spencer: Hey Andy I don't get home until after the night edit lock is put on. I can haz night edits plz? Andy: well, you don't have any substantiative edits in the last month! Gee Andy, I wonder why that is...
• Java7837 claims: "I am an Orthodox Jew and despise liberal stupidity" but the arch zionist fox disagrees: "(no you are not, u are a provacateur or a parodist)" and wields the banhammer
• It's "Make up a new term and label it as important" time again! This time: Wikipedia Newspeak - you know, like how Wikipedia censors the whole "evolution as theory" thing.
• Andy vows to clean up his blog, so fictional dates like "8500BC" get replaced by more fuzzy phrases. Also, MORAL DECAY
• Liberal friendship talk page just gets better. Highlights include Andy failing his deadline by several days and counting, being called out by one of his own, and bullying other users to avoid answering those uncomfortable questions.
• Before Conservative floods this off the Recent Changes: Somebody actually did some research about the "[WorldNetDaily] was voted the most popular website on the Internet" claim. Let's see how Andy twists reality in this case!
• Another prophecy from Kenservative. Read carefully, he's predicting events two years in the past. Try again, o mighty seer!
• Filed under "things only sysops can get away with": PJR asks a question on December 31, Conservative replies almost two weeks later (and only to promise that an explanation would come roughly a month later), and then misses even that "February" deadline. But hey, that makes him only "a day late" - and to top it off, the answer is still not there, but give him five minutes to write a mail.
• Ah, the cowardice of Andy (can you really call it intellectual?). Hiding the evidence that you're an idiot doesn't make you look less like an idiot, dude. It just makes you look like a dishonest idiot.
• As a German, I can only shake my head at Andy's homeschooling sob story and the alleged state of German schools. But it's nice to see that he apparently supports breaking/evading the law when it's not convenient.