Negative proof

From RationalWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

A negative proof is a logical fallacy which takes the structure of:

"X is true because there is no proof that X is false."

If the only evidence for something's existence is a lack of evidence for it not existing, then the default position is one of skepticism and not credulity. This type of negative proof is common in proofs of God's existence or in pseudosciences where it is used to attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic rather than the proponent of the idea. The burden of proof is on the individual proposing existence, not the one questioning existence.

A common retort to a negative proof is to reference the existence of Invisible Pink Unicorns as just as valid as the proposed entity of the debate.

One important element to remember in regards to negative proof is that once positive evidence has been presented the burden shifts to the skeptic to refute the evidence presented. One cannot keep arguing from the position of "negative proof" after the presentation of evidence.

[edit] See also

Personal tools