Disproving Intelligent Design

From RationalWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Scientists claim that Intelligent Design cannot be falsified and consequently is not science. This article includes all the arguments put forward by creationists showing how Intelligent Design could theoretically be disproved. Hmm...let me 'splain...a theory, to be scientific, must be falsifiable. Name some scenarios which, if they were true, would falsify (render incorrect), ID. They do not actually have to be factual...just potentially factual.



(Please don't mind the sound of crickets...)






(520 days and counting...)

  Evolution Articles on RationalWiki  
Locke: a response  -  Acceptance (STUB)  -  Behe interview  -  Cladistics  -  Common descent: the incontrovertible evidence  -  Conservapedia: Dinosaur  -  Conservapedia: Theory of Evolution  -  Converging lines of evidence  -  Darwinism  -  De-evolution (STUB)  -  Dinosaur  -  Disproving Evolution  -  Eugenics  -  Evobabble  -  Evolution  -  Evolutionist  -  Fossil record  -  Hominid  -  Human  -  Macroevolution  -  Microevolution  -  Natural selection  -  Niche  -  Phylogeny  -  Signal detection theory  -  Social Darwinism  -  Stephen Jay Gould  -  Theory of Evolution  -  Wedge Document  -




[edit] See also

Personal tools