Balance fallacy
From RationalWiki
| “ | There's a kind of notion that everyone's opinion is equally valid. My arse! A bloke who's been a professor of dentistry for 40 years doesn't have a debate with some ijit who removes his teeth with string and a door! | ” |
| —Dara O'Briain | ||
The fallacy of balance occurs when two sides of an argument are assumed to have equal value. Here, for instance, this is shown as a reporter giving equal time to people who believe the sun is hot and cold, and here we hear theories about broccoli and garden gnomes.
A real world example is the Discovery Institute's campaign for American schools to "Teach the Controversy" in science lessons, giving equal weight to the theory of evolution and intelligent design criticisms of it, although these criticisms are reliant on creationist religious views overwhelmingly discredited within the scientific community.
In American politics, this is sometimes referred to as "Broderism", after the Washington Post columnist who can never name a single thing Republicans have done wrong without dredging up one (often isolated, sometimes apocryphal) thing that Democrats have done wrong as well.
| Articles about logical fallacies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formal fallacies | |||||
| Informal fallacies | |||||
|
Balance fallacy | |||||
| Red herrings | |||||
| Conditional fallacies | |||||
| Fallacious argument styles | |||||

